Understand the certification
Professional Scrum Master II(PSM II)是 Scrum.org 在 PSM I 之上设置的高级认证,由 Ken Schwaber 创立的 Scrum.org 于 2010 年推出。全球约 48,000 人持有 PSM II(截至 2025 年底 Scrum.org 官方数据),相比 PSM I 的 70 万+ 持证人,通过率极低。
考试格式与 PSM I 完全不同:30 题 / 90 分钟 / 85% 通过线,全部是多段落情景判断题(Scenario-Based),没有简单的知识点选择题。每道题描述一个具体工作场景("团队的 Daily Scrum 退化成向你汇报状态,PO 经常缺席 Sprint Review,管理层要求你汇报团队 Velocity..."),你要选择最合适的 Scrum Master 行动。
PSM II 和 PSM I 的本质区别:PSM I 考"Scrum Guide 写了什么",PSM II 考"Scrum Master 在真实场景里应该怎么做"。PSM I 有标准答案(Scrum Guide 原文),PSM II 的"正确"答案来自 Servant Leadership、系统思维和教练心理学 — 这些 Scrum Guide 不会直接教你。
考试费 $250 USD,终身有效,不需要先通过 PSM I(但 Scrum.org 强烈建议你先有 PSM I + 至少 1 年实际 SM 经验)。没有强制培训要求,但 Scrum.org 推荐的 Professional Scrum Master II 课程约 $1,200-1,500(2 天)。
Exam at a glance
- Exam code
- PSM II
- Provider
- 其他
- Format
- single-choice / multiple-choice
- Language
- English
- Validity
- 3 years
Skills in focus
Learning outcomes
- 掌握高级 Scrum Master 在复杂组织场景中的最佳决策框架,应对灰色地带情景题
- 系统建立 Servant Leadership 思维模式,能区分教练、促进、指导、管理的适用场景
- 获得 PSM II 认证,证明高级 Scrum Master 能力,支撑 Senior SM 或 Agile Coach 职业晋升
Who this is for
- 已获得 PSM I 认证、有 1-2 年实际 Scrum Master 工作经验的从业者
- 目标晋升为 Senior Scrum Master 或 Agile Coach 的专业人士
- 希望系统提升组织敏捷转型推动能力的技术管理者
- Scrum Alliance CSP-SM 认证候选人(PSM II 知识体系高度互补)
Before you start
- 已持有 PSM I 认证,或对 Scrum Guide 2020 有深度掌握
- 建议具备至少 1 年实际 Scrum Master 或敏捷教练工作经验(有助于理解复杂情景题)
- 了解 Servant Leadership、Coaching 和 Facilitation 基本概念
Consider another path if
- PSM I 不到 6 个月、缺乏实际 SM 经验的人 — 情景题需要真实工作积累
- 不走 SM / Agile Coach 路线的纯开发者 — 投入产出比不高
- 公司只认 SAFe 框架的环境 — 考 SAFe Scrum Master 或 RTE 更实用
- 预算有限只能考一张敏捷证的人 — PSM I 的 ROI 更高
Your learning path
3 chapters
Plan your preparation
- Learning hours
- 19h
- With relevant experience
- 4-6 weeks
- Starting from scratch
- 8-12 weeks
- Daily study
- 1-2h
Included in your preparation
- 99+ 道高难度情景判断题,严格模拟 PSM II 真实考试风格
- 每题含深度解析,阐明 Servant Leadership 原则在复杂场景中的应用逻辑
- 模拟真实考试环境:90 分钟 / 30 题 / 85% 通过线
- AI 智能辅导,针对教练、促进、冲突处理等薄弱场景提供专项训练
- 专项覆盖管理层压力、团队冲突、自管理引导等 PSM II 核心高频场景
1. 第一阶段:重读 Scrum Guide + 补 Servant Leadership 理论(1-2 周)
PSM II 的答案逻辑建立在 Servant Leadership 之上。重读 Scrum Guide 2020 但这次关注"为什么"而不是"是什么"。额外阅读 Scrum.org 博客上 Barry Overeem 的《The 8 Stances of a Scrum Master》系列(免费),这是 PSM II 的非官方教材。还要读 Bob Galen 的《Scrum Product Ownership》中关于 PO-SM 职责边界的章节。
2. 第二阶段:刷 Scrum.org 官方 PSM II Open Assessment(2 周)
Scrum.org 提供免费的 PSM II Open Assessment(30 题 / 90 分钟 / 85%),题型和真考完全一致。目标是连续 3 次达到 90%+。每做错一题,写下"为什么我选的答案不如正确答案更符合 Servant Leadership 原则"。这个反思过程比刷题本身更重要。
3. 第三阶段:场景分析训练 — 区分"做教练"和"做决策"(2 周)
PSM II 最核心的考点:SM 不替团队做决定。准备一个笔记本,把自己日常工作中的真实场景写下来("PO 和开发吵架了我怎么处理""管理层要求加需求进 Sprint"),然后用 PSM II 的标准答案逻辑重新审视你的处理方式。80% 的错题来自"你的直觉是帮团队解决问题,但正确答案是引导团队自己解决问题"。
4. 第四阶段:模拟考试 + 实考(1 周)
用 Volkerdon 或 Mikhail Lapshin 的 PSM II 付费模拟题做 2-3 次全真模考,稳定 87%+ 再约考。考试报名后 14 天内完成,在线无监考。30 题 90 分钟看似时间充裕,但情景题每道需要读 2-3 段文字,实际时间很紧。做题节奏:每题不超过 3 分钟,难题标记跳过,最后 15 分钟回头处理。
Career value
PSM II 不是"PSM I 的升级版",它们考的是完全不同的能力。
PSM I 证明你读懂了 Scrum Guide,PSM II 证明你能在组织政治、团队冲突、管理层压力下做出正确的教练式决策。在 Seek 和 LinkedIn 上,Senior Scrum Master / Agile Coach 岗位中约 15-20% 明确要求或偏好 "PSM II or equivalent",这个比例在金融和保险行业更高(CBA、Suncorp、IAG 等)。
薪资跳板效应:澳洲市场上 PSM I 持证者中位薪资约 AUD 130-155K,而 PSM II 持证者(通常已有 3-5 年 SM 经验)中位薪资约 AUD 155-185K。但这个差距主要来自经验而不是证书本身 — PSM II 更多是"证明你已经到了那个水平"而不是"帮你到达那个水平"。
不值得考的人:刚拿到 PSM I 不到 6 个月的人(缺乏情景积累,通过率极低);不打算走 SM / Agile Coach 路线的开发者(对你的职业路径没有直接加分);公司只认 SAFe 的环境(考 SAFe SM 或 RTE 更对口)。
- 澳洲
- AUD 150,000 – 190,000
- 美国
- USD 130,000 – 175,000
- 中国
- CNY 400,000 – 700,000
- 新加坡
- SGD 110,000 – 160,000
Preparation tips
- **永远选"教练式"而非"指令式"** — "SM facilitates a discussion about..." 优于 "SM tells the team to...","SM helps the PO understand..." 优于 "SM explains to the PO that..."。
- **"谁的职责"是高频陷阱** — Sprint Backlog 是 Developers 的、Product Backlog 是 PO 的、SM 不拥有任何 Artifact。如果选项暗示"SM 更新 Sprint Backlog"或"SM 调整 Product Backlog 优先级",直接排除。
- **30 题 90 分钟 = 每题 3 分钟** — 比 PSM I 时间宽松很多,但情景描述更长。建议先快速扫一遍所有题,把"一看就知道答案"的题先做完,复杂多选题留到后面。
- **Velocity 不是绩效指标** — 任何暗示用 Velocity 比较团队或评估个人绩效的选项都是错的。Velocity 只用于团队内部预测和 Sprint 规划。
Common mistakes
- **选择"SM 去跟管理层谈"而不是"SM 教团队去跟管理层谈"** — PSM II 的核心逻辑是 SM 赋能团队而不是代替团队行动。看到"SM 去做 X"和"SM 帮助团队做 X"两个选项时,后者几乎总是对的。
- **把 PSM II 当 PSM I 的升级版来准备** — 继续死背 Scrum Guide 条文没用,PSM II 不考你"Scrum Guide 第几页写了什么",考的是"遇到这个场景你的 SM 反应是什么"。
- **忽略 Evidence-Based Management(EBM)** — PSM II 会考 2-3 题关于用数据做决策的场景,比如"管理层用 Velocity 评价团队绩效,SM 应该怎么回应"。不读 Scrum.org 的 EBM Guide 会丢分。
- **多选题少选或多选** — 和 PSM I 一样,多选题不告诉你选几个。30 题里约 8-10 题是多选,每题要全部选对才得分。
- **情景题只读最后一句就选答案** — 每道题的前 2-3 句描述了具体上下文(团队成熟度、组织文化、当前困境),不同上下文下正确答案完全不同。
Before you register
How much harder is PSM II compared to PSM I? What preparation is needed?
PSM II is significantly harder than PSM I and is considered one of the most challenging Scrum certifications. Key differences: (1) Only 30 questions but many are open-ended/situational judgment requiring deep thinking within 90 minutes; (2) Same 85% passing score, but questions test "gray areas" — no obviously correct answers, you must choose the "best" approach; (3) PSM I tests "what is Scrum," PSM II tests "what do you do when Scrum encounters real-world problems." Allow at least 2-3 months of preparation, combining study with actual Scrum Master work experience to contextualize the scenarios.
What are the situational judgment questions like? What common scenarios appear?
Most PSM II questions present complex workplace scenarios requiring the best Scrum Master response. Common scenarios include: (1) Management pressures the team to accept extra work and shorten Sprints — how to handle organizational pressure; (2) Conflicts between the Product Owner and Developers — how to facilitate rather than arbitrate; (3) Daily Scrum becomes a status report to the SM — how to guide the team toward self-management; (4) Coordination challenges when multiple Scrum Teams share one Product Backlog; (5) Organizational Agile transformation facing resistance — SM as a change agent. Answers should reflect a coaching mindset, not command-and-control.
Do I need real Scrum Master experience for PSM II? Can I pass with theory alone?
While there is no formal experience requirement, PSM II is designed to test practicing Scrum Masters. Passing on theory alone is extremely difficult because: (1) Scenarios come from real workplace situations — without experience, identifying the "best" option is challenging; (2) The exam tests advanced skills like facilitation, coaching, mentoring, and conflict resolution — these require practical experience; (3) Understanding organizational Scrum challenges (cross-team collaboration, management buy-in) is essential. Minimum 1-2 years of Scrum Master or Agile Coach experience is recommended. If experience is limited, supplement with extensive case studies and Scrum.org blog articles.
What Servant Leadership topics are tested on PSM II?
Servant Leadership is the most central PSM II theme, woven through nearly every question. Key topics: (1) Concrete SM Servant Leader behaviors — listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion (not coercion), conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to growth, community building; (2) How SMs drive change through influence rather than authority when facing organizational pressure; (3) How to help teams transition from "being managed" to "self-managing" — reduced dependence on the SM is a success indicator; (4) Coaching questions — guiding teams to discover problems and solutions themselves rather than providing direct answers.
What is the difference between PSM II and PSM III? Do I need PSM III after passing PSM II?
PSM III is Scrum.org's highest-level Scrum Master certification with very few holders globally. PSM II tests "experienced Scrum Masters," PSM III tests "expert-level Scrum Masters and Agile leaders." PSM III features: (1) Essay questions requiring detailed written explanations of your thinking and recommendations; (2) Scope extends to organizational Agile transformation, Large-Scale Scrum, and Evidence-Based Management; (3) Extremely low pass rate (estimated 10-20%). For most practitioners, PSM II is sufficient to demonstrate advanced Scrum Master capability. PSM III suits those pursuing Agile coaching/consulting careers.
What is PSM II worth in the job market? How does it compare to A-CSM and CSP-SM?
PSM II is highly recognized, especially among employers who value demonstrated ability over training certificates. Compared to Scrum Alliance: A-CSM (Advanced CSM) requires classroom training plus a simple assessment — more of a "participation certificate"; CSP-SM (Certified Scrum Professional) requires years of experience plus training credits, with barriers being time and cost investment. PSM II requires no training courses, validating competence purely through a rigorous exam, giving it stronger perceived credibility. In Australian and global IT markets, Senior Scrum Master and Agile Coach positions increasingly list PSM II as a preferred certification. Holders average 15-25% higher salaries than those with only PSM I/CSM.
Learner experiences
Loading reviews…
PSM I 我考了 95%,PSM II 第一次只有 80% 没过。差距在于 PSM II 的每个选项都"看起来对",区别在于哪个更符合教练式而不是指令式思维。我复盘发现自己在工作中的 SM 角色其实偏"项目经理",比如帮团队排障碍而不是教团队自己排。改变这个思维模式花了我整整一个月。
R. Chen
Scrum Master 3 年 → Senior SM · 87.5% · 6 weeks
准备 PSM II 期间我读了 Barry Overeem 的"8 Stances",发现 SM 的角色不只是 facilitator — 还有 teacher、mentor、manager、impediment remover、change agent。考试里有好几题的正确答案就是"SM 作为 teacher 教团队 Scrum 原则"而不是"SM 作为 manager 告诉团队该怎么做"。这个区分是 PSM II 的灵魂。
S. Patel
Tech Lead → Agile Coach · 90% · 5 weeks
Start with the first chapter.
2 free chapters · Full preparation from $39